In addition to airworthiness certification, BASAs, moUs and WAs provide for bilateral cooperation in other aviation sectors, including maintenance, flight operations and environmental certification. While this agreement covers a wide range of aviation-related aspects, including licensing and training of air transport personnel and services, we should focus on the mutual recognition of quotas and the `free movement of civil air products`. The bilateral aviation safety agreement between the EU and China entered into force on 1 September. The agreement was first signed in Brussels on 20 May 2019. This bilateral agreement, which mainly concerns the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC), “will simplify the process of obtaining product authorizations. at the same time, we will ensure that high safety and environmental standards continue to be met. » What will be the real impact of this agreement on the aviation industry? These agreements will ensure the continuity of agreements with the United States, Canada, Brazil and Japan when the United Kingdom leaves the European Union. The agreements were reached following extensive discussions between the UK Civil Aviation Administration (CAA), the Department of Transport (DfT) and the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). They offer airlines and aerospace companies in both countries the certainty that transatlantic trade can continue in a no-deal scenario, with minimal changes to the current surveillance system. Details of the new enforcement procedures agreed under the bilateral aviation safety agreements between the UK and the US under the bilateral aviation safety agreement were discussed today with representatives of the aerospace industry at an event at the US Embassy in London. The agreements ensure that the level of cooperation between the two authorities and their systems remains the same if the UK leaves the European Union (EU) without a negotiated withdrawal. In addition to the new Annexes, the EU and the United States have agreed on an amendment to the BASA Maintenance Annex to allow maintenance organisations from all EU Member States to participate in safety cooperation in accordance with the BASA Framework, confirming the highest aviation safety standards of the European Union and the oversight function of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (hereinafter the ” AESA”).
Do you think that this bilateral agreement benefits one party more than the other? Does anyone have a gross market? Let us know your thoughts in the comments. The United Kingdom currently has similar bilateral security agreements with aviation authorities in Canada and Brazil. Richard Moriarty, Director General of the UK Civil Aviation Administration, told the US Embassy in London: “We are grateful to the Federal Aviation Administration for the positive way in which they have approached our discussions. These agreements are an important part of our overall contingency plans to ensure a smooth transition for consumers and industry when the UK leaves the EU. During the meeting, EASA and CAAC adopted the Technical Implementation Procedures (TIP) that will support the agreement, including with regard to airworthiness. Those administrative and technical procedures shall describe how the two civil aviation regulators will carry out the validation and mutual recognition of product approvals for civil aviation. Safety regulations between the two countries are currently being implemented within a framework defined between the US and the EU. . . .
